Med Device Monday: Recall of the Raindrop Vision Inlay Device

wet eyeglasses.jpg

In April 2017, we wrote about a new device called the Raindrop Vision Inlay, manufactured at the time by ReVision Optics. Approved in 2016, the device is basically a small implantable contact lens that reshapes the front of the eye and corrects presbyopia, more commonly known as farsightedness. A little over two years later, the Raindrop Vision Inlay was the subject of an FDA Safety Communication recommending patients not receive the device. After post-market research, FDA identified an increased risk of corneal haze, or the development of a cloudy layer within the eye that impairs overall vision. Shortly thereafter, in November 2018, FDA issued a Class I recall - the most serious type of recall - reserved for devices that may cause serious injuries.

So, what happened?

Going back to 2016, the Raindrop Vision Inlay was given FDA approval in large part due to a two-year clinical trial that yielded promising results, including high numbers of patients who could read smaller print at closer distance post-op. At the time of device approval, the clinical study showed that while 16.1% (60 of 373) of patients had central corneal haze of any severity at some point during follow-up, the percentage of patients with two or more lines of loss in vision on the eye chart caused by corneal haze was 1.1% (4 of 373 patients). The number of patients who had the device removed was 24 of 373 patients (6.4%) at the two-year follow-up visit, with 29% of those device removals (7 of 24 patients) being due to corneal haze.

The Raindrop Vision Inlay was marketed under the conditions that the device be restricted to prescription use and specifically labeled to define the training or experience practitioners needed in order to implant the device. Marketing of the device was also conditional on the reporting of results from two post-approval studies (PAS), one that followed patients enrolled in the original clinical study, and a second that tracked newly enrolled patients. Of the 373 patients from the original study, 150 were enrolled in the PAS. The most recent data from the ongoing study, including 5 years of follow-up in some patients, showed that the rate of central corneal haze, at any time during the study, was 42% (63 of 150 patients), and that the presence of haze at any location within the cornea was a whopping 75% (113 of 150 patients). The percentage of patients with two or more lines loss on the eye chart caused by corneal haze remained low at 2.0% (3 of 150 patients), however that was greater than what was observed during the original clinical study. After evaluation of the PAS data, the risks outweighed the benefits of the device and lead the company and FDA to initiate the recall.

It is awful that the Raindrop Vision Inlay caused any patients implanted with the device to suffer, and one might be quick to judge that FDA ‘screwed up’ by allowing an unsafe device to be sold. The whole story is quite a bit more complicated, however, and we feel the Raindrop Vision Inlay situation is an example of FDA working to uphold its mission. In this situation, FDA took responsibility for both helping speed innovation that would potentially improve patient’s lives, and for ensuring the safety and effectiveness of a medical device before and after market approval.

FDA closely monitors reports of adverse events and other problems with medical devices, and alerts health professionals and the public when needed to ensure their proper use. FDA has stated that it is currently working with the owner of the Raindrop Vision Inlay, Optics Medical, on a plan to collect any remaining devices already distributed. FDA will continue to gather and evaluate data related to the recalled device, and communicate new information as warranted.

Further Reading:

1. FDA Safety Communication

2. Raindrop Vision Inlay PMA Approval Letter

3. Summary of Safety and Effectiveness Data

4. Raindrop Vision Inlay Recall Notice